Lives depend on asbestos removal plans – IOSH
Any plans for the mass removal of asbestos from public and commercial buildings in the UK must include detailed information on how those charged with doing the work will be protected and how it will be disposed of.
The Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH) also says that consideration must be given to better prevention methods while asbestos is still present in buildings.
After a 40-year deadline was recommended by MPs for the removing all asbestos in public and commercial buildings, IOSH has given a stark warning that “lives depend” on ensuring any plans are thoroughly considered.
The UK Government has been urged to commit to a strategy in a report from the Work and Pensions Committee which highlights the risks still faced from asbestos. In compiling the report, the committee gathered oral and written evidence from many organisations, including IOSH.
Responding to the report, Ruth Wilkinson, IOSH’s Head of Health and Safety, said: “We support the recommendation for there to be an overall ‘plan’ developed by the Government and Health and Safety Executive, but we urge caution over doing this without research and evidence around safe removal and disposal.
“Removing asbestos is something which is fraught with risks, so any decision to do so is something which cannot be taken lightly. Full consideration must be given to how the people removing it are protected and where the asbestos goes from there, including its packaging, transportation and final disposal – particularly when considering the large number of buildings this plan will relate to.
“So, we would expect to see that any such plans will include detailed information on how these risks will be managed to prevent significant exposure during this process.”
Ruth added that should a 40-year plan be set, there would still be a risk for anyone coming into contact with asbestos in that time.
She said: “So, it is crucial that greater protection is offered to these people, and that a risk-based approach is taken as recommended by the committee.
“There is currently a lack of consistency in managing asbestos among duty holders and a lack of awareness and knowledge about it among those who are coming into contact with it, particularly in smaller businesses. We would like to see a collective effort by policy makers, government, regulators, employers and worker representatives. This should include improved training for employees in how to deal with asbestos, clearer guidance around working with asbestos and more awareness raising about the dangers of exposure.
“Action is needed now. People’s lives depend on it.”