How to stop safety getting lost in translation
Understanding matters more than compliance when communicating safety.
- Date posted
- 13 August 2026
- Type
- Opinion
- Author
- Jeremy Waterfield
- Estimated reading time
- 3 minute read
IOSH Student member Muzammil Rafi recently completed a dissertation on safety communication within multicultural construction environments for his MSc at the University of Portsmouth.
The UK construction industry relies on a culturally and linguistically diverse workforce. This diversity contributes valuable skills and experience, but it also creates challenges when safety information is not communicated in a way that everyone can fully understand.
Understanding safety across cultures
"My MSc dissertation, Lost in Translation: Language Barriers and Safety Communication in Multicultural Construction Sites in the UK, explored how language and cultural differences affect safety communication, daily operations and workers’ behaviour.
The research was based on semi-structured interviews with 18 participants, including migrant construction workers and site supervisors and managers."
One of the most important findings was that language barriers can come from much more than a worker’s level of English. Communication can also be affected by accents, speaking speed, use of slang, colloquial expressions, background noise, time pressure and the mental effort required to process instructions while completing demanding tasks.
This means communication problems should not simply be treated as individual weaknesses. They are organisational safety risks influenced by the working environment, leadership approach and the way information is delivered.
Does compliance equal understanding?
A worker may appear to understand an instruction, nod in agreement and perform a task correctly by copying others. However, this does not necessarily mean that the worker understands the hazard, the reason for the control measure or what to do when circumstances change.
“My research identified a distinction between functional compliance and deep safety understanding. Workers may learn safe behaviour through repetition, observation and imitation without fully understanding the reasoning behind it. Although this can produce correct behaviour in familiar situations, it may leave workers less able to identify new hazards, adapt to changing conditions or respond safely when something unexpected occurs.Managers should therefore avoid assuming that silence, agreement or the absence of questions confirms understanding.”
Muzammil Rafi
- Job role
- MSc Graduate
- Company
- University of Portsmouth
Hierarchy can mute workers
Cultural attitudes towards authority also influenced communication. Some workers were reluctant to question supervisors because they felt embarrassed, feared being judged or believed that challenging instructions would be disrespectful.
Productivity pressure made the problem worse. When teams were working to tight programmes, safety communication often became brief and directive, leaving limited opportunity for workers to ask questions or seek clarification.
Creating psychological safety is therefore essential. Workers must feel able to say that they do not understand without fearing criticism or negative consequences.
Communication must be checked
The research showed that visual communication was particularly effective. Demonstrations, diagrams, gestures, pictorial task cards and physical task modelling can reduce reliance on spoken English and help workers connect instructions with the work they are expected to perform.
However, providing information is only the first step. Supervisors should verify understanding by asking workers to explain or demonstrate the task in their own words.
-
This 'teach-back' approach is more reliable than asking “do you understand?”, which may only produce a polite “yes”.
Construction organisations should:
- Use clear, simple and standardised safety language
- Avoid slang, idioms and vague expressions
- Combine verbal instructions with visuals and demonstrations
- Provide structured bilingual or peer support where appropriate
- Allow sufficient time for questions and clarification
- Regularly check understanding through discussion and observation.
Effective safety communication is not about simplifying standards or lowering expectations. It is about making sure every worker receives, interprets and applies safety information correctly.
Understanding is what counts
Just because a safety message has been delivered doesn’t mean it’s been successfully communicated. It has only been communicated when it has been properly understood.
Join the conversation
We are inviting health and safety professionals to share their own views: what challenges are you thinking about? What’s working in your organisation? What’s broken?
Last updated: 13 August 2026
Jeremy Waterfield
- Job role
- PR & Public Affairs Executive
- Company
- IOSH
IOSH